There's an old saying "Don't argue with a mule, it does no good and it annoys the mule."
Once again we have some moron writing a letter to the editor questioning global warming. And we will then be treated to another rebuttal pointing out the vast array of scientific evidence supporting the changes CO2 emissions is having on our environment.
Why?
People who refuse to see what is happening cannot be swayed by facts. For whatever reason they are instead rationalizing the decision they have already made and clearly are unwilling to logically evaluate the issue. Human beings are many times not rational creatures, but instead rationalizing creatures.
The Daily Camera would not print letter after letter arguing that the world was flat (and rebuttals pointing out that it's been proven to be round). Why can't the Camera just print a notice of no more letters about global warming (or evolution) because there is no point. The science is clear and the faith-based will not be swayed with facts.
