My Photo

Support Blogging

« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

What Boulder restaurant is going down next?

I guessed that the Railyards would go first (mediocre food and lousy service) - and it did.

My guess for the next is Islands Burgers. Which is too bad because they do make their burgers like they are made in Hawaii and I love that. But...

  1. Friday evening and it's mostly empty.
  2. The employees all look and act like they've been told they'll be shot at dawn.
  3. They always get at least one meal wrong which has to be sent back.

If you don't love burgers cooked the Hawaiian way, you are unlikely to come back. My guess is they'll be closed by June.

Bye bye Clint Talbott

Clint Talbott is leaving the Daily Camera. I thought he generally did a good to great job. And at times I thought he was totally off-base. So in my book that makes him a really good editorialist - if I agreed with him too much then he wasn't doing a good job.

But I am also glad to see him moving on. Why? Because I think the editorial page needs to have new blood regularly. Having the same voice, year after year, no matter how good, does not serve us well. No matter how good someone is they will have things they care more about, blind spots, weakness, etc. A change means we get a different balance of those pluses and minuses.

So Clint, I am glad you were there, and it is time for you to move on. Good luck in your new job. (And could someone at the Camera write an article that actually explains what his new job does???)

Whats a little global warming between friends

The Boulder City government is our friend. Really they are. Just ask them. And so what if they waste gasoline, adding to our oil imports and adding to the global warming. It's just a small drop in the bucket (well a couple of gallons in the bucket, daily) and what's that between friends.

In the article on the radar van is this little gem:

But Huntley said it’s debatable whether the vans are actually parked, since an operator is always on board — and, she said, the engine’s always left running.

Why on earth is the engine left running? The van is parked somewhere all day long and is left idling????? It has a digital flash camera - that should run off batteries for hours if not all day. Same for any radio the person in the van needs.

And why do they have someone in the van? We are paying someone to sit on their ass all day long doing nothing? Wow, even Crystal Gray actually did something at work for a couple of hours each day (while charging for a full 8 hours).

Our City government, the poster boy for "do as I say, not as I do."

CD-2: War of the legal complaints

Ok, Will charged Jared with incomplete donor filings. Jared raised Will with fradulent donor filings. Now Will raises Jared with stealing their donor list and violating the CANSPAM act.

It has come to our attention that you may be receiving unsolicited emails from the Jared Polis campaign. We believe their campaign may have illegally obtained our donor email list. While we continue to investigate we urge you to call the Polis campaign at (303) 381-0121 and ask to be removed from their list and also ask how they obtained your email address in the first place. You can also follow this link to file a complaint with the FTC if you would like to do so https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod

At the Shafroth campaign we have a policy of not selling or giving away your personal information and we are taking this breach very seriously. Please feel free to call me on my cell phone with any questions (303)579-8794.

Sincerely, Lynea Hansen

Pretty clearly Jared pounded Will back hard to try and end Will taking this approach. And now pretty clearly Will is taking that not as a warning but as a challange and is firing back with a pretty serious claim.

I don't think anyone predicted this - Joan keeps her head down and Jared and Will fire at each other. Joan's gotta be having a good day.

Anyone out there that is on Will's email list but not Jared's? If so, did you recently start getting emails from Jared's campaign? (I'm on all 3 so I would not know.)

If this did happen, this will be very bad for Jared. If this did not happen, it's very hard to prove a negative. So not good for Jared.

ps - Will sends a link for complaints - and it's the U.S. Army's link to the FTC. Any idea why?

President Barack Obama

I think this was the finest political speech by a presidential candidate in the last 100 years. Better than anything by FDR, JFK, Reagan, or Clinton. I was supporting Obama before this. Now I believe.

Yes it was an honest, nuanced look at race where he spoke to all sides of the issue. And he did not skirt around any of it - he faced it all straight on. And in doing so he has put us on the road to further addressing racism and its associated issues. And yet, I think this amazing achievement was secondary to what else he did.

Barack Obama chose to take a complicated difficult issue fraught with political peril and instead of simplifying it to a series of one liners or to skirt the hard issues, he spoke to the full issue dealing with the subtle nuances necessary to do so. And in so doing he required that we put in the time and effort to truly listen and consider and think about what he was saying.

He talked for 38 minutes and he bet his future political career that we would devote 38 minutes to listening and then understanding what he was saying. And he succeeded. This is a man who can lead us through the solutions to the issues we now face.

Second, this was the speech of a true patriot. Not the easy patriotism of fighting the enemy. Not the false patriotism of longing for the good old days. This was the true patriotism of a citizen who loves this country, treasures it for what it is, and believes in it for what it can be. Many talk about how this country is the "city on the hill." Barack Obama believes that and will take us further up that path.

Third, his speech on race was a speech between equals (not people who have reached equality - but people who are equals). Maybe only a bi-racial candidate could first take us to this point. We are all people, we are all Americans, all children are "our children." There is inequality but we are all equal.

To quote Andrew Sullivan

And it was a reflection of faith - deep, hopeful, transcending faith in the promises of the Gospels. And it was about America - its unique promise, its historic purpose, and our duty to take up the burden to perfect this union - today, in our time, in our way.

And Charles Kaiser

No other presidential candidate in the past 40 years has managed to speak so much truth so eloquently at such a crucial juncture in his campaign as Barack Obama did today.

I now see in Barack Obama, with his willingness to speak honestly and forthrightly, no matter how difficult it is, someone who I think will make, not a good president, but a great president. Every time this country has truly needed a great president, we have been blessed with one. Once again...

CD-2 Delegate count

Below is what I have been able to find from various newspaper articles (yes it's very incomplete). Anyone with additional numbers please email them to david@thielen.com and I will update.

County Joan Fitz-Gerald Jared Polis Uncomitted (Will Shafroth?)
del vote % del % vote % del % vote % del %
Adams 219 74 34 46 21 99* 45
Boulder 376 515 59 230 61 328 37 146 39 37 4 0 0
Broomfield 59 26 44 31 53 2 3
Clear Creek 15 15 100 0 0 0 0
Eagle 46 25 54 21 45 0 0
Gilpin 9 6.5 72 2.5 28 0 0
Grand 18 13.5 75 0 0 4.5 25
Jefferson 63 41 65 22 35 0 0
Summit 38 56 77 29 76 17 23 9 24 0 0 0 0
Weld 29 21 73 8 27 0 0
totals 872 484 56 286 33 100 11
* Adams County sends 99 delegates forward as uncommitted. Apparently they thought our primary process was not Byzantine enough. I have no idea how they will vote.

Boulder County Convention - what it means

Ok, we had the convention, what does it all mean? This is what I see as the major items, after sleeping on it.

First off, the Boulder Democratic party is incredibly well run. I can't say enough how impressed I am with how smoothly the whole thing ran. Major kudos to Deb Gardner and her entire crew. You did the impossible and made it look easy. (Deb Gardner for governor in 2014?)

Here is what I think is the biggest data point from yesterday - well over 90% of the attendees are not party activists. Everyone was talking about how 95% had never attended a county convention before but Claire Levy was in that group and I think we have to count her as an activist. The important data point is that most of these people probably could not have named the 3 amigos. They were there to vote for Obama or Clinton and the rest was other stuff they were also asked to do.

Which means, having the party base on your side was good for maybe 5% of the vote. In fact, not everyone there will bother to vote in the August primary. But I think it is reasonable to say that the results are a good indicator of how a primary vote would play out if it was held today. So let's drop the "candidate X had an insider advantage" because that wasn't worth much.

SD-18

Ok, this was easily the biggest surprise of the day. Rollie had the backing of most of the activists. And Cindy had recently been busy shooting herself in the foot. So everyone thought the questions was "would Cindy hit 30%?" And Cindy won with 53%. This totally changes the race.

I think the speeches of each candidate had a gigantic effect here. First off Rollie's way of carrying himself reinforces his age negatively - and that has an impact. Rollie also gave a very deliberate speech where he listed the issues we face, but did not sell us that he has the skills and the ideas to address them. He may very well have all that, but he has to convince and sell it.

Cindy got up there and had energy and drive and threw out the one-liners that gave the crowd the red meat it wanted to hear. Personally I tend to be driven away by that as I worry it means the candidate is all sizzle and no steak. But the crowd ate it up (or at least 53% did).

I think for Rollie to win he's going to have to shift gears big time and come across as energetic, impassioned, and dive into why he has the skills to address the issues we face, and do so in a way that gets across in quick sound-bites.

I think for Cindy to win she needs to push for as many live debates as possible and just keep improving her presentation. I wish it didn't work this way but if you can sell the sizzle well, it's very effective. And she can sell it.

Oh, and so far I am under-impressed with both. Hopefully the campaign will give one a chance to show they will be a strong effective contributor in the legislature.

CD-2

Will Shafroth is toast. He's a nice guy, I think he would make a good rep, and he has 0 traction. Anyone who supported Will, plus any who just couldn't decide, added up to 4% of the vote. It's not there. And the thing is, Will's resume does not stack up to Joan's or Jared's and voters do want to have a track record as past effort is a good indicator of future effort. (I'd love to see Will switch to SD-18, he would rock in that race and a couple of terms in the state house would give him a great list of accomplishments to point to.)

And again, lets go back to this was not the party activists. Will was given a slot to speak before the CD-2 vote. He presented his case with an equal shot to Joan & Jared, to a group that is reasonably representative of the voters in the upcoming primary, and it didn't resonate.

Jared's got a tough road ahead of him. 40% among party activists would have been a great accomplishment. Across all the counties (Adams & Boulder being the big dogs) I think Jared is at a hair under 40%. Figure if Will stays in it will be Joan at 55% and if Will drops out Joan at 60% and this means Jared is in serious trouble.

On the flip side, this is no worse than where John McCain and Barack Obama were 5 months before the presidential primaries started (and Huckabee was an asterisk). Jared has 5 months to change the dynamics and a week is a lifetime in politics.

What Jared needs to do is to find something that resonates big-time with the electorate. And based on how Jared approaches the race (and life), he will keep trying. So I think he's a bit down now, but definitely not out and still has a decent chance.

Joan is rocking. I really enjoy watching a professional who performs their job brilliantly regardless of what that job is. Joan is a joy to watch in action. What Joan needs to do to win is continue executing perfectly (or close to it).

I support Jared but I find all three candidates (and their staffs) to be very impressive.

Mark Udall

Be afraid, be very afraid. We had Mark's wife presenting for Mark. We had Ken Salazar (has he ever been seen without his cowboy hat?) talking about Mark. We had several others discussing the Senate race. And the single reason they gave for electing Mark is to flip a Senate vote from Republican to Democratic.

Now this is a very strong reason as there are numerous times in the Senate right now that critical measures fail by 1 vote. And every Dem will vote for Mark come November.

But this does not lead to a charged up base. This does not lead to volunteers. This does not lead to donations. And this does not give the unaffiliated, the voters that decide the election, a good reason to vote for Mark. Moderates prefer a divided government and so many could easily balance their vote for Obama/Clinton with one for Schaffer.

If Mark continues down this road I worry that he will lose most of the moderates and be left with mostly those who will vote for the Democratic candidate regardless of who it is. That is a losing proposition in Colorado.

To win Mark needs to start actively campaigning on why people should be charged up to vote for him. To get the base energized and to get the middle sold. And he needs to get his ass in gear yesterday.

Obama

I saw no ground game there for Obama. On the flip side the Clinton campaign was there in force - big time. The Clinton campaign sent Wellington Webb in person (and boy is he good). I even had one person handing out some Obama flier tell me that they had it in the bag.

This is not won yet. I worry, not just for the primary, but for the general election too. Whichever candidate wins, they need to fight for the general nomination down to the last second and for every single vote. As an Obama delegate, worrisome...

Once we have a nominee...

There's a lot of people worrying about what happens once we have a nominee, be it Obama or Clinton. Every time someone spoke to this issue and how we had to line up and support the winner, the place erupted in cheers. I don't think we need to worry on this count. (One suggestion, regardless of who wins, put Wellington Webb up on the stage to speak to this issue - immediately.)

How to get Elected as a Delegate 101

I got a comment earlier saying they hoped I voted for all 87 slots. Are you kidding? I knew maybe 5 people on the ballot. I voted for myself, Claire Levy and Suze Ageton (both quality politicians), and a college freshman who is a friend of one of my daughters (and will be a good delegate).

But I realized that most others there were in the same predicament - they knew a couple of people and that was it. So I went around and traded votes. I said I was blogging and would appreciate their vote. And without exception people said they would vote for me if I would vote for them. And I happily did so.

So I voted for about 30 people knowing absolutely nothing about what kind of delegate they would be in exchange for their vote for me. Vote trading pure and simple. (In fact my daughter's friend did the same - "Dave, vote for me and I'll vote for you.") My guess is that will put me near the top in votes.

So we all condemn politicians for the horse trading inherent in getting legislation moved forward. But when it came time for me to get sent to the state convention, I did the same thing, pure & simple.

Live blogging - The Boulder County Convention

5:38

Ok, we finished voting. I don't know if I made it to the state convention. We get to send 78 delegates so we all filled in the ballots and they will count them and let us know. I ran around trading votes with lots of people and most others just sat there so I think I have it.

For the CD-2 convention they got 6 people to drop out and then there was no need for a ballot as we had 78. So I'm definitely going there.

And that concludes the convention.

4:28

The vote is in and Barack kicked ass - big time. Barack Obama 878 (75.75%), Hillary Clinton 281 (24.24%).

3:44

Deb Gardner who's running the meeting is doing a kick-ass job. She has the perfect mix of room mom and drill Sargent to make this run amazingly efficiently considering the fact that we have 2,000 people and almost none of them know how this works. She is a great choice.

3:19

Ok, we have quorum. Alternates are seated where delegates did not show up and we have 100% of the slots seated - 1,200 people. How can the Republicans win when we have every seat filled for this all-day sit forever to then vote for 3 seconds? We are going to rock in November!

3:11

Ok, we got the Obama video and it was good and got cheering at times. As well as laughter when the 12 year old Obama precinct captain was in it. At the end of the video almost everyone here was on their feet, cheering and chanting "yes we can." This level of support is incredibly powerful.

David Skaggs is speaking for Obama. He's good, but he's no Wellington Webb.  His speech is on the intangibles (like Obama), and it sells well. And on his close we again have a standing ovation with "yes we can."

This is an Obama crowd.

3:06

Wellington Webb is a superb speaker. He closed with the importance of us all working together to elect our candidate. He had half the audience on it's feet and everyone clapping loudly at the finish. Very good job.

2:57

In a move of breathtaking sanity there was a motion on the floor to skip the presidential speeches as we're all committed. The screams for it made it clear it would pass. However, apparently all the alternates are not seated yet and so they proposed the speeches go forward while the alternates are seated.

So we get a Hillary video and it's doing ok when she tries the 3 am line - and the place erupts in boos. Massive boos. People settled back down as it continued and there was scattered cheering at times and then she lists the states she won and when she said Florida, the booing was even louder. I don't think she did herself any favors with that video.

Now we have Wellington Webb speaking for Hillary. She started off saying we must come together behind whoever our candidate is and that got a gigantic round of applause. He's now talking about why Hillary is good, listing out why he supports Hillary and does not mention Barack even though he brings up the issues they differ on. He's done a good job of figure out how to best speak to this crowd.

2:23

I just met Wanda James for the first time - she's a very nice person. I've also talked to Matt Mosley a couple of times here, another really nice person. We've definitely got an embarrassment of riches with the 3 amigos, not just the candidates but their staff too. (And yet this state also sends Tom Tancredo, Marilyn Musgrave and Doug Lamborn to Washington. I guess that is the karmic balancing for our state...)

2:01

Official count JFG gets 238 delegates and JP gets 146. On the SD-18 primary it's Cindy 280 vs Rollie 245. I'd put that down to Cindy's speech being a lot more compelling. She had people fired up with her spewing out the standard progressive talking points.

I'm no fan of Hillary Hall (I think she's incompetent) but was directed to her to get vote totals. I'm assuming she has no idea who I was when I asked her for the results. What a bitch. So she's incompetent and not a nice person - what a winning combo.

1:34

Results - I got these 2nd hand here but I'm sure they are correct. CD-2 JFG 515 (61%), JP 328 (39%), WS 37 (0%). This is not good for Jared. Yes Joan owns the party activists but I'd say 90% of the people here are first time attendees. 60/40 is a gigantic challenge. On the flip side, Jared (my man!) has 5 months and a week is a lifetime in politics. So advantage Joan. And horrible news for Will.

JeffCo for CD-2, same source, JFG 65%, JP 35%.

12:51

Cindy Carlisle's 3 nominators (every other managed with 2) took forever to talk. And the first 2 put us all to sleep. We're now getting a listing of the progressive policies she supports. Getting a much better response from the audience as she is selling what everyone here wants to hear. More money for schools, single-payer, eliminate the death penalty, and legalize single sex marriage.

To me this is Cindy, it's what everyone wants to hear regardless of the likelihood of it passing. So really good speech, but I don't know if she would be able to effect much (any?) of it.

12:43

We're starting the SD-18 discussion. Rollie Heath is giving a clear listing of his experience and the issues he will work on. It's more selling his competence than an effort to inspire. But he's got the votes so that does work.

12:14

Well I voted for Udall & Polis - long, long, long lines to vote. And ballot security is pretty loose. All paper ballots that will be hand counted - nice to know we use reliable technology for the primaries. On the bad news side, they said Hillary Hall is helping with the counting so we may not have results for a couple of days.

11:22

Joan Fitz-Gerald - Joan had music playing as she entered which helped boost it. Probably about twice as many signs waving for her over Jared. She's up there by herself after a short intro from her campaign manager.

Cut funding to Iraq and pull the troops out. Wants to end NCLB and feed more money to the schools - which should get her the school employee vote big time. It's interesting, she talks to the bills she would overturn or bring forward. Her framework is what specifically she needs to go do to accomplish her goals.

Speaks eloquently to the civil liberties issues (lots of applause), to universal health care, and closes with a thank you. Lots of people standing and cheering on her close.

11:15

Jared Polis - Jared walks in with about 40 people in t-shirts following him in with lots in the audience waving Polis signs. Very impressive entrance. He's got 40 supporters, all holding signs up on the stage as others go up to speak for him.

Good discussion of his background and why that makes him a good candidate. Then into the issues - environment, single-payer health care, improve the schools, etc. Closes it with how he will be in there every day working his ass off to effect the major changes needed.

Got a strong response to his speech throughout.

11:11

Will Shafroth - Will is good. He does a great job of speaking to the issues, touching on the hot points, and why he would be a good advocate for us in Congress. And he clearly would focus on the environment as that is his passion. He also brought up what I think his campaign focus will be - that he is not beholden to anyone.

He got the hook! First one where he went so far over the time limit they took the mike away.

11:01

The plan was that all three CD-2 candidates got to speak before the vote. We now have a proposal to not let Will speak until after the vote as he is not running here at the convention. This looks like it might be a close vote.

Nope - maybe 30 in favor, 1,000+ against. So Will gets to speak now.

10:57

Bill Winter spoke for Betsy Markey and gave a great speech with a strong response. But it was all Democrats good, Republicans and Marilyn Musgrave bad. Not a single word about what Betsy would do. It sold well and MM is so bad it's a good argument. But I think it's a lot more powerful if they would actually say one thing she would concentrate on...

10:40

We have Ken Salazar speaking now. This is interesting, we don't have the Ken Salazar who votes a moderate line and follows the Republicans on FISA, Iraq, etc. Instead we get a litany of exactly what everyone here wants to hear - out of Iraq, health care for all, no obscene profits for oil companies, etc. He has everyone her cheering (and booing Bush and Allard). This is a very different Ken Salazar.

Shouting out why we need Udall, he is getting 10 times the cheers for Udall that Mark's wife did. All of it for the fact that it flips one vote in the Senate. And it sells - big time.

I've never heard Ken speak before - he is good. And he gives credit to everyone in the local party here, elected by name and leaders by group. I can see why he wins. His strength is how he interacts in person.

Closed with saying we need to strongly support Clinton or Obama, regardless of which wins the primary. And that got a standing ovation. I think the party will pull together once one of them wins.

10:21

Now we are into the regent race for CD-2. We have an actual race here with 3 candidates. Time to wake back up. Howard Wachtel - this guy is a horrible public speaker. He says he will be a voice from the center reaching across the aisle to reach compromise. I don't think that is going to sell well in this group.

Kurt Williams - this guy is good. He talks eloquently to major issue after major issue. And what brought out the most time and emotion from him is making education affordable. He comes across as a superb candidate. This guy is good.

Joe Neguse - lots of signs for him being waved. Intro by Alice Madden. And then he comes out and is a rock star. He worked them up to major cheers - for him. Not much in the way of specifics although he did brush on affordability.

Williams vs Neguse is going to be an interesting race. They're both very good campaigners.

10:16

And now the Assessor - the incumbent assessor. Gee, I wonder what is going to happen...

10:04

Having all these positions (D.A., Country Commissioner, etc) where there is zero competition grates on me. This is not Democracy any more than the USSR with their elections with a single candidate are a democracy. The root problem is that the Republicans here have given up, not that we Democrats take advantage of it. But it is a problem.

Will Toor under-impressed. Ben Pearlman did pretty good although I hope he knows his comment that food grown locally is easier on the climate is bogus.

9:58

And now the boring speeches to nominate the incumbent county commissioners. Once again a slam dunk from here through the general election. Will Toor did have one funny comment though - "it's so nice to look out and see so many Democrats." Will, that's true anywhere you go in Boulder.

9:46

We're in the process of nominating Stan Garnett for D.A. He's a slam-dunk with no primary opponent and probably no general opponent. And truth to tell, he'll probably do a good job. But everyone is just waiting for the speeches to end so we can approve him. It's boring when it's a done deal.

I'd like to see Stan run in a competitive race sometime - I think he would be a good campaigner. They asked for a voice vote and only asked for those in favor, no chance to vote no.

9:38

Ok, Boulder does not fail to disappoint. We are now getting more proposals from the floor. First off people, we have several thousand people here and it is not possible to discuss what should be in the platform in this setting. Go join the platform committee.

Second, to the person who's proposal included restoring Iraq to how it was - how exactly do you bring Saddam back from the dead to put him back in charge? Lets apply some logic people.

9:29

Shock, surprise, oh my. Instead of just accepting the party platform, there is a motion to suspend the rules to add an item to the platform. Everything is getting very confused with various people screaming questions, motions, etc.

We just had a vote on if we can suspend. The voice vote sounded even to me and they are now saying they have to hand count. Nope, they had all in favor stand. Called it for yes without asking the no votes to stand.

Now we must vote on do we suspend the rules and pass the amendment. Asked for a voice vote and the no's sounded louder but I think it was more adamant voters. Now we go to standing. Motion clearly was defeated.

9:25

I've never seen or heard Pat Waak before. She's good. Strong emotional responses to all of her main points. Standard red meat for the delegates but she does it well.

9:18

We're over with the Udall presentation. Ow. The second half was 4 people with pretty generic items about Mark. The response to each was pretty perfunctory except for one presenter when he stated he was one of the lost boys of Sudan, and is now a US citizen. He got a strong emotional response - for him.

If this is the response Mark is getting from the Dems in Boulder who are delegates - he may be in a lot of trouble. We'll all vote for him, but I don't know if he is going to get much passion or effort. There were only 2 people waving Udall signs during the speech - out of several thousand here.

9:00

Does Mark Udall exist? He sent his wife to speak for him - at the county that is his biggest base of support. Mark is apparently over at the JeffCo assembly. The speech is all about how we need a Dem as Senator. And how "we all need" to support Mark regardless of what is said. Interesting not a word about what Mark himself would do...

8:45

We "start" at 8:30 and they are now making noises about actually starting. Lots of Joan Fitz-Gerald signs, t-shirts, etc everywhere. I think it's expected that she will win here but based on people (not signs on the wall) with JFG items, she might pull over 70%. The CD-2 vote will be interesting...

8:30

I'm in! There are an immense number of people here. On the signs going in it is 90% Hillary Clinton and Brandon Shaffer (running for State Senate) with almost identical signs. Entering the lobby it's lots of Joan Fitz-Gerald supporters, and some for Jared Polis, Rollie Heath, and a couple of others.

Surprisingly few people out for Obama. And most of those are handmade signs. Very weird, there may be virtually no official Obama presence here.

Parking is a mess, I parked a block away and it's worse now. But the registration process is very fast and smooth. So far the party is doing a great job.

7:30

On my way over to Skyline High (with a stop at Denny's for breakfast).

Bruce Benson - full of shit

Ok, I gave Bruce the benefit of the doubt. I figured we should all get behind him and try to make him a success. And so what is the first thing he does? We have from the Daily Camera [emphasis added]:

The offer was a one-year contract. Benson will be paid $378,000 a year, the same salary as Brown.

"I'm not doing it for the money," Benson said today. "I'm doing it because I think there is so much to accomplish. I think the University of Colorado can take the lead of higher education in the state."

Bullshit. With his balance sheet taking a salary of $1 would have been a class act. Taking the average salary of a full professor could be defended as an equitable pay package. Hell, taking the full amount and making a statement that acknowledges why he is getting so much would be lousy, but acceptable.

But to push for the maximum amount, and to then claim it's not the money. I don't buy it. And it's a dumb way to start the job after the incredibly contentious confirmation fight. So Bruce, it's not just that this adds to the concern that you'll do a lousy job - now we have to worry that you're politically tone-deaf. And that's fatal in this job.

And the primary continues... Good!

I'm writing this as the results are still coming in, Ohio has 40% reported and Texas 17%. But it looks like Hillary had a blow-out win in Ohio and Texas will essentially end in a tie. And with this Hillary is still in the race.

This is fantastic news for us Dems. The primary will continue to at least Penn. And maybe all the way to the convention. And what of McCain during that time? He can campaign, he can talk to the press, he can advertise. And none of it will do him any good. Every bit of political attention will be on something that is new to most voters - a contested primary that could run all the way to the convention.

And what will everyone paying attention to the race be hearing? The talking points from Hillary & Barack, the advertising from both, the debates of the two of them. All anyone is going to hear is what we Dems bring to the table. It's free advertising and it's exclusively Democratic.

Yes they'll beat each other up some. But it's not like McCain and the Republican 527s won't do the same, and worse. So this lets us see how each handles the attacks, and which attacks hurt. Both will be very seasoned warriors by the time they clinch the nomination.

And meanwhile McCain will remain irrelevant and will get further out of practice for a campaign.

Google

  • Google

    WWW
    www.davidthielen.info

Excellent Books